Sep 4, 2026
New York has no statewide vexatious-litigant blacklist, yet it processes millions of cases while confronting everything from panicked tenants to determined serial filers. How does the system keep its doors open without letting abuse consume the courts? Host Jack Russo examines New York’s distinctly flexible answer: Part 130 sanctions, judge-crafted filing injunctions, and electronic gatekeeping rather than California-style statutory barriers. But the deeper twist is philosophical. New York increasingly treats mass self-representation not simply as misconduct to punish, but as an access-to-justice problem, even expanding representation for tenants facing eviction. On the criminal side, that open-door instinct becomes even more pronounced when liberty is at stake. The question for Jack: can judicial discretion and better access to counsel control abuse without creating a system that is itself too easy to exploit?